Welcome!

Flu Vaccination Rates Disappointing

Posted: December 27th, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Travel Vaccines Updates | Tags: , , , , , | Comments Off on Flu Vaccination Rates Disappointing

Every flu season is different. Strains evolve and influenza vaccine manufacturers alter their formulas to meet those changes, covering the three influenza viruses that research indicates will be most prevalent during a given season.

But despite the wide availability of a vaccine–the U.S. FDA green-lighted influenza vaccines from 6 vaccine manufacturers this year–the illness remains a killer. Between 1976 and 2007, estimates of the number of flu-associated deaths range from 3,000 to 49,000, the Centers for Disease Control reports. About 90% of those deaths happened among people ages 65 and older.  

Further, vaccination rates last year fell far below the CDC’s target rates of 80%, coming in at around 42%. About 39% of adults were vaccinated during the 2011-2012 influenza season, compared with 75% of children between the ages of 6 months and 23 months and just more than a third of adolescents.

This year, a total of 135 million doses of influenza vaccine will be on hand.

So, what do these less-than-stellar vaccination rates mean for sales? Looking at actual worldwide 2011 sales numbers and estimated worldwide 2012 sales numbers provided by EvaluatePharma, it seems sales as a whole are only slightly up for the top 10 best-selling flu vaccines.

Novartis will likely see the biggest jump in sales of its OptaFlu vaccine; the company reported $36 million in 2011 sales and EvaluatePharma projects $71 million in 2012 sales. Sanofi’s and Sanofi Pasteur MSD’s Fluzone (sold as Vaxigrip outside the U.S.) will likely bring a $10 million jump in sales, from $1.333 billion in 2011 to a projected $1.343 billion this year.

The outlook isn’t all promising for the top 10, though. Abbott Laboratories’ Influvac will probably see a $10 million drop, from $198 million in 2011 sales to an estimated $188 million in 2012. Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma’s BIKEN HA vaccine will also lose out, slumping by $6 million from $114 million in 2011 sales to a projected $108 million in 2012.

“The changing world demographic provides a definite opportunity for companies offering flu vaccines, as populations age and chronic conditions become more prevalent,” Moser said. “With this trend towards an older, less healthy population, demand should continue to increase for flu vaccines for the foreseeable future, with a non-specific vaccine that can protect against ever-evolving influenza strains being the holy grail in this space.”

Enhanced by Zemanta

Vaccine Company Fights Antitrust Allegations

Posted: September 13th, 2012 | Author: | Filed under: Passport Health Sarasota-Bradenton Announcements | Tags: , , , , , | Comments Off on Vaccine Company Fights Antitrust Allegations

Sanofi Pasteur may find itself in the thick of an antitrust case after a judge ruled that a lawsuit alleging that the company illegally monopolized the market for meningococcal vaccines in theU.S. can move forward.

Sanofi

Sanofi (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

In December, several doctors said the company created a “web of noncompetitive contracts” with physician buying groups that blocked competition in an effort to sell its vaccine MenactraPharmalot reports. Using its market authority, Sanofi grouped price contracts, forcing purchasers to buy 90% or more of childhood vaccines to avoid potential cost penalties on Menactra, according to the news service. So, in theory, a buyer could end up paying 15% to 35% more for all Sanofi vaccines if they elect not to buy Menactra. The doctors surmise Sanofi’s idea here was to promote its Menactra vaccine after Novartis ($NVS) joined the game with rival Menveo.

Furthermore, the lawsuit says the doctors were told, under contract, not to purchase vaccines from other makers–such as GlaxoSmithKline ($GSK) and Novartis–or they would face penalties.

A Sanofi Pasteur spokesman wrote to Pharmalot, “naturally we are disappointed in the judge’s ruling, but we are confident that once the court sees the evidence of competition in the marketplace, it will rule against the plaintiffs. We continue to defend our company and our product, and we maintain that allegations in the class action complaint are without merit.”